Repository logo

"Mice can roar": small island states in international environmental policy

dc.contributor.authorShibuya, Eric Yoichi, author
dc.contributor.authorStevis, Dimitris, advisor
dc.contributor.authorLester, James P., committee member
dc.contributor.authorCharlton, Sue Ellen N., committee member
dc.contributor.authorLacy, Michael, committee member
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-06T18:22:40Z
dc.date.issued1999
dc.description.abstractThis work investigates the question, "how do the small island states influence international environmental policy?" The cases examined are the work to develop the South Pacific Nuclear Free Zone and the efforts of the island states in arguing for a strong international agreement to alleviate climate change. I argue that the greatest impact the small island states can have upon international environmental policy is at the pre-decision, agenda setting stage. The agenda setting framework developed by Kingdon (1984), is the one which forms the backbone of my study. I argue that the greatest influence of the island states occur in the development of the construction of the problem. Some problems make the option of waiting for more information a viable policy alternative, while other problem constructions insist on immediate, decisive action. In this effort to influence the definition of the problem, the island states attempt to gain the aid and support of the middle powers, a tactic that has advantages and drawbacks. The advantages are that the support of the middle powers gives the island states' proposals greater weight. However, a potential drawback is that the middle powers may dilute the stance of the island states by modifying the agreement. Also, international factors beyond the immediate influence of the island states (elections, regime changes, and changes in the international structure) can provide favorable conditions for the island states to push their point of view, or close off an avenue of action. With some modifications, Kingdon's agenda setting framework, originally designed and applied to the United States government, holds up surprisingly well when extended to an international issue and incorporating many states. The major modification occurs in the problem stream and the issue of problem definition, which I argue does not stand apart from Kingdon's other streams, but must be filtered through those other streams. This framework has tremendous utility for advancing our knowledge in international relations.
dc.format.mediumdoctoral dissertations
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10217/243966
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.25675/3.026632
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherColorado State University. Libraries
dc.relation.ispartof1980-1999
dc.rightsCopyright and other restrictions may apply. User is responsible for compliance with all applicable laws. For information about copyright law, please see https://libguides.colostate.edu/copyright.
dc.rights.licensePer the terms of a contractual agreement, all use of this item is limited to the non-commercial use of Colorado State University and its authorized users.
dc.subjectpolitical science
dc.subjectenvironmental science
dc.title"Mice can roar": small island states in international environmental policy
dc.title.alternativeMice can roar: small island states in international environmental policy
dc.typeText
dcterms.rights.dplaThis Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights (https://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/). You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
thesis.degree.disciplinePolitical Science
thesis.degree.grantorColorado State University
thesis.degree.levelDoctoral
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.)

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ETDF_PQ_1999_9941564.pdf
Size:
13.6 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format