Repository logo
 

Understanding and quantifying the uncertainties in satellite warm rain retrievals

dc.contributor.authorSchulte, Richard, author
dc.contributor.authorKummerow, Christian D., advisor
dc.contributor.authorBell, Michael, committee member
dc.contributor.authorBoukabara, Sid, committee member
dc.contributor.authorReising, Steven, committee member
dc.contributor.authorvan Leeuwen, Peter Jan, committee member
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-30T10:22:46Z
dc.date.available2022-05-30T10:22:46Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractSatellite-based oceanic precipitation estimates, particularly those derived from the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) satellite and CloudSat, suffer from significant disagreement over regions of the globe where warm rain processes are dominant. Part of the uncertainty stems from differing assumptions about drop size distributions (DSDs). Satellite radar-based retrieval algorithms rely on DSD assumptions that may be overly simplistic, while radiometers further struggle to distinguish cloud water from rain. The aim of this study is to quantify uncertainties related to DSD assumptions in satellite precipitation retrievals, contextualize these uncertainties by comparing them to the uncertainty caused by other important factors like nonuniform beam filling, surface clutter, and vertical variability, and to see if GPM and CloudSat warm rainfall estimates can be partially reconciled if a consistent DSD model is assumed. Surface disdrometer data are used to examine the impact of DSD variability on the ability of three satellite architectures to accurately estimate warm rainfall rates. Two architectures are similar to existing instrument combinations on the GPM Core Observatory and CloudSat, while the third is a theoretical triple frequency radar/radiometer architecture. An optimal estimation algorithm is developed to retrieve rain rates from synthetic satellite measurements, and it is found that the assumed DSD shape can have a large impact on retrieved rain rate, with biases on the order of 100% in some cases. To compare these uncertainties against the effects of horizontal and vertical inhomogeneity, satellite measurements are also simulated using output from a high-resolution cloud resolving model. Finally, the optimal estimation algorithm is used to retrieve rain rates from near-coincident observations made by GPM and CloudSat. The algorithm retrieves more rain from the CloudSat observations than from the GPM observations, due in large part to GPM's insensitivity to light rain. However, the results also suggest an important role for DSD assumptions in explaining the discrepancy. When DSD assumptions are made consistent between the two retrievals, the gap in total accumulation between GPM and CloudSat is reduced by about 25%.
dc.format.mediumborn digital
dc.format.mediumdoctoral dissertations
dc.identifierSchulte_colostate_0053A_17127.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10217/235321
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherColorado State University. Libraries
dc.relation.ispartof2020-
dc.rightsCopyright and other restrictions may apply. User is responsible for compliance with all applicable laws. For information about copyright law, please see https://libguides.colostate.edu/copyright.
dc.titleUnderstanding and quantifying the uncertainties in satellite warm rain retrievals
dc.typeText
dcterms.rights.dplaThis Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights (https://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/). You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
thesis.degree.disciplineAtmospheric Science
thesis.degree.grantorColorado State University
thesis.degree.levelDoctoral
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.)

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Schulte_colostate_0053A_17127.pdf
Size:
2.82 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format