Control methods for wild pigs in the U.S.: best management practices
| dc.contributor.author | Bodenchuk, Michael J., speaker | |
| dc.contributor.author | Higginbotham, Billy, moderator | |
| dc.contributor.author | International Wildlife Ranching Symposium, producer | |
| dc.coverage.spatial | Texas | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2007-01-03T05:21:24Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2007-01-03T05:21:24Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2014-09 | |
| dc.description | Moderator: Billy Higginbotham. | |
| dc.description | Presented at the 8th international congress for wildlife and livelihoods on private and communal lands: livestock, tourism, and spirit, that was held on September 7-12, 2014 in Estes Park, Colorado. | |
| dc.description | To request a transcript, please contact library_digitaladmin@mail.colostate.edu or call (970) 491-1844. | |
| dc.description.abstract | Wild pigs (Sus scrofa) are widespread throughout the continental United States and significant efforts have been initiated to contain population spread. Removal of wild pigs in the United States is currently limited to mechanical capture methods. The Texas Cooperative Wildlife Services program implements an integrated wild pig damage management program and has investigated all current removal methods. This presentation will discuss aerial shooting, cage and corral trapping, snaring, shooting (including night shooting) and the use of dogs as control methods. The relative costs for each method implemented will be discussed in the context of a large metapopulation where additional pigs are available to replace removed animals. Costs, represented on a per pig removed basis, are lowest for turbine helicopter aerial shooting ($18.27 per pig removed), piston helicopter aerial shooting ($21.11/pig) and night shooting ($25.06) followed closely by fixed-wing aerial shooting ($26.63/pig) and daytime shooting ($29.92 /pig). Corral trapping ($46.95/pig) was more expensive than aerial or night shooting, but cost less than snaring ($62.51/pig) or drop nets ($64.91/pig). The practical application of specific methods is critical to method selection. For example, while aerial shooting may be comparatively the most cost effective method costs will be much higher when small numbers of pigs are expected and flying may not be possible in many areas due to terrain and vegetative cover. Because wild pigs in Texas exist in a large meta-population, costs for control are exacerbated by source/sink population dynamics. The removal of wild pigs in such environments requires return visits which significantly increase costs. | |
| dc.format.extent | 30 minutes 44 seconds | |
| dc.format.medium | born digital | |
| dc.format.medium | motion pictures (visual works) | |
| dc.format.medium | digital moving image formats | |
| dc.format.medium | Presentation slides | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10217/86176 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.25675/10217/86176 | |
| dc.language | English | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.publisher | Colorado State University. Libraries | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Wild and Feral Pigs | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | 8th international wildlife ranching symposium | |
| dc.rights | Copyright and other restrictions may apply. User is responsible for compliance with all applicable laws. For information about copyright law, please see https://libguides.colostate.edu/copyright. | |
| dc.subject | Wildlife management -- Congresses | |
| dc.subject | Range management -- Congresses | |
| dc.title | Control methods for wild pigs in the U.S.: best management practices | |
| dc.title.alternative | Control methods for wild pigs in the United States- best management practices | |
| dc.type | MovingImage | |
| dc.type | Text | |
| dc.type | Image |