Repository logo
 

Constraints on mechanical fuel reduction treatments in USFS Wildfire Crisis Strategy priority landscapes

Abstract

The US Forest Service recently launched a Wildfire Crisis Strategy outlining objectives to safeguard communities and other values at risk by substantially increasing the pace and scale of fuel reduction treatment. This analysis quantified layered operational constraints to mechanical fuel reduction treatments including existing vegetation, protected areas, steep slopes, and administrative boundaries in prioritized landscapes. A Google Earth Engine workflow was developed to analyze the area where mechanical treatment is allowed and operationally feasible under three scenarios representing a range of management alternatives under current standards. Results suggest that a business-as-usual approach to mechanical fuel reduction is unlikely in most landscapes to achieve the 20-40% of high-risk area treatment objective using mechanical methods alone. Increased monetary spending to overcome physical constraints to mechanical treatment (e.g., steep slopes and road access) opens sufficient acreage to meet treatment objectives in 18 of 21 priority landscapes. Achieving treatment objectives in the remaining landscapes will require both increased spending and navigating administrative complexities within reserved land allocations to implement fuels treatments at the pace and scale needed to moderate fire risk to communities. Broadening the land base available for treatment allows for flexibility to develop treatment plans that optimize across the multiple-dimensions of effective landscape-scale fuel treatment design. Spatial identification of the constraints to mechanical operability allows managers and policymakers to effectively prioritize mechanical and managed fire treatments.

Description

Rights Access

Subject

fuels management
forest planning

Citation

Associated Publications