Repository logo

Mechanisms of executive control: behavioral investigations of the conflict adaptation effect

dc.contributor.authorBugg, Julie M., author
dc.contributor.authorDeLosh, Edward L., advisor
dc.contributor.authorClegg, Benjamin, committee member
dc.contributor.authorGingerich, Karla J., committee member
dc.contributor.authorDavies, Patricia L., committee member
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-16T18:21:20Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.description.abstractThe conflict adaptation effect refers to a reduction in reaction time on an incompatible trial of the Eriksen Flanker task that is preceded by another incompatible trial as compared to being preceded by a compatible trial. The repetition priming account contends that the effect is a memory phenomenon limited to complete repetition trials. The conflict monitoring account contends that preceding trial conflict triggers a tightening of control, making participants less susceptible to conflict on the subsequent incompatible trial. The effect is expected, therefore, on complete repetition and non-repetition trials. Experiments 1, 2, and 3 were designed to contrast the two accounts by manipulating the degree of conflict present on incompatible trials. In Experiment 1, conflict was manipulated by varying the frequency of incompatible trials. The conflict adaptation effect was found on repetition but not non-repetition trials, with a trend toward greater conflict adaptation in response to greater conflict in the mostly compatible condition. In Experiment 2, conflict was manipulated by varying the identity of the flanker stimuli, with left or right flankers expected to produce a greater degree of response conflict than up or down flankers. The conflict adaptation effect was observed for both repetition and non-repetition trials though a greater degree of conflict did not result in greater adaptation. In Experiment 3, conflict was manipulated by altering the size of the incompatible flankers to be either larger or smaller than the central stimulus. Again, the conflict adaptation effect was limited to repetition trials and the degree of conflict did not alter the magnitude of the effect. A negative priming explanation of the lack of conflict adaptation on non-repetition trials was not supported in Experiment 4, though a follow-up experiment revealed a 16 ms negative priming effect. Taken together, the results suggest that the conflict adaptation effect reflects repetition priming and under some conditions, conflict monitoring. Further clarifying the nature of these conditions such as the size of the response set, size of the stimulus set, and the length of the response to stimulus interval is an important next step in this line of research.
dc.format.mediumdoctoral dissertations
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10217/243642
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.25675/3.026362
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherColorado State University. Libraries
dc.relation.ispartof2000-2019
dc.rightsCopyright and other restrictions may apply. User is responsible for compliance with all applicable laws. For information about copyright law, please see https://libguides.colostate.edu/copyright.
dc.rights.licensePer the terms of a contractual agreement, all use of this item is limited to the non-commercial use of Colorado State University and its authorized users.
dc.subjectcognitive therapy
dc.subjectcognitive psychology
dc.titleMechanisms of executive control: behavioral investigations of the conflict adaptation effect
dc.typeText
dcterms.rights.dplaThis Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights (https://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/). You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
thesis.degree.disciplinePsychology
thesis.degree.grantorColorado State University
thesis.degree.levelDoctoral
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.)

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ETDF_PQ_2006_3233326.pdf
Size:
2.3 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format