Sustainable use as a function of biodiversity and agricultural development: exploring the impacts of dysfunctional conservation jurisprudence
| dc.contributor.author | Dry, G. C., author | |
| dc.contributor.author | International Wildlife Ranching Symposium, publisher | |
| dc.coverage.spatial | Africa | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-05-30T14:13:40Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-05-30T14:13:40Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016-09 | |
| dc.description | Presented at the 9th international wildlife ranching symposium: wildlife - the key to prosperity for rural communities, held on 12-16 September 2016 at Hotel Safari & the Safari Court, Windhoek, Namibia. | |
| dc.description | Includes bibliographical references. | |
| dc.description.abstract | Game ranching in the RSA takes place on 20 million ha of agricultural land and makes a far bigger contribution to biodiversity than dated conservation (preservation) regulatory regimes 'enforced' on agricultural land that is not, and never will be, conservation land. CoP17, CITES, IUCN or the South African NEMBA do not recognise or count any animals in game ranching on semi-extensive and game-fenced agricultural land as "wild animals", e.g. the Red List data recently released. This means, in effect, that game farmed on semi-extensive land does not reside under the international intent, governance, conventions or resolutions. The above mentioned agencies do not count any farmed game on private game ranches, given their definitions of "wild animals" in the "wild". This year for instance, the USA Fish and Wildlife Services advised South Africa that in terms of the USA ESA listing, stricter measures to import hunted lion or bontebok trophies, will be enforced regardless whether wild or captive bred. The hunter must now be in a position to prove "enhancement in the wild". The Architect of the Universe stopped making land; not humanity. Land will be shared by growing populations, agricultural development and conservation ideology. Key wildlife recovery in Africa is not technical or ecological, but carefully crafted legal and performance measures to ensure sustainable use. International dysfunctional jurisprudence leads to declining conservation and community development on the African continent, and is not self-correcting. | |
| dc.format.medium | born digital | |
| dc.format.medium | Presentation slides | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10217/180937 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.25675/10217/180937 | |
| dc.language | English | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.publisher | Colorado State University. Libraries | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | 9th International Wildlife Ranching Symposium | |
| dc.rights | Copyright and other restrictions may apply. User is responsible for compliance with all applicable laws. For information about copyright law, please see https://libguides.colostate.edu/copyright. | |
| dc.title | Sustainable use as a function of biodiversity and agricultural development: exploring the impacts of dysfunctional conservation jurisprudence | |
| dc.type | Text | |
| dc.type | Image |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- CONF_IWRS_2016-plenary3_9-Dry.pdf
- Size:
- 2.35 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format