Repository logo
 

Multiple choice testing and the retrieval hypothesis of the testing effect

dc.contributor.authorSensenig, Amanda E., author
dc.contributor.authorDeLosh, Edward, advisor
dc.contributor.authorDavalos, Deana, committee member
dc.contributor.authorMcCabe, David, committee member
dc.contributor.authorDe Miranda, Michael, committee member
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-08T19:04:28Z
dc.date.available2022-04-08T19:04:28Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.descriptionCovers not scanned.
dc.descriptionPrint version deaccessioned 2022.
dc.description.abstractTaking a test often leads to enhanced later memory for the tested information, a phenomenon known as the “testing effect”. This memory advantage has been reliably demonstrated with recall tests but not multiple choice tests. One potential explanation for this finding is that multiple choice tests do not rely on retrieval processes to the same extent as other types of tests. The set of experiments reported here examines the retrieval hypothesis of the testing effect in multiple choice testing. Experiment 1 is a replication and extension of previous research (Roediger & Marsh, 2005) with the addition of a re-study comparison condition. Experiments 2a and 2b encouraged participants to engage in retrieval processes during multiple choice tests. Experiment 3 implemented a version of the remember/know paradigm in order to assess retrieval of individual items on a multiple choice test. Overall, multiple choice testing did not produce a memory advantage over re-studying the material in the experiments reported here. The results of these experiments are discussed in light of the retrieval hypothesis of the testing effect.
dc.format.mediumdoctoral dissertations
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10217/234646
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherColorado State University. Libraries
dc.relationCatalog record number (MMS ID): 991014246619703361
dc.relationLB3060.32.M85 S457 2010
dc.relation.ispartof2000-2019
dc.rightsCopyright and other restrictions may apply. User is responsible for compliance with all applicable laws. For information about copyright law, please see https://libguides.colostate.edu/copyright.
dc.subject.lcshMultiple-choice examinations
dc.subject.lcshMemory
dc.titleMultiple choice testing and the retrieval hypothesis of the testing effect
dc.typeText
dcterms.rights.dplaThis Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights (https://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/). You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
thesis.degree.disciplinePsychology
thesis.degree.grantorColorado State University
thesis.degree.levelDoctoral
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.)

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ETDF_2010_Spring_Sensenig_Amanda_E.pdf
Size:
10.33 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format