Repository logo
 

How does land use affect the relative abundance of two mesopredators in the, Eastern Cape, South Africa?

dc.contributor.authorParker, D. M., speaker
dc.contributor.authorKok, A. D., speaker
dc.contributor.authorPerry, T. W., speaker
dc.contributor.authorvan Hoven, Wouter, moderator
dc.contributor.authorInternational Wildlife Ranching Symposium, producer
dc.coverage.spatialEastern Cape (South Africa)
dc.date.accessioned2007-01-03T05:11:00Z
dc.date.available2007-01-03T05:11:00Z
dc.date.issued2014-09
dc.descriptionModerator: Wouter van Hoven.
dc.descriptionPresented at the 8th international congress for wildlife and livelihoods on private and communal lands: livestock, tourism, and spirit, that was held on September 7-12, 2014 in Estes Park, Colorado.
dc.descriptionPresenter: Armand Kok.
dc.descriptionTo request a transcript, please contact library_digitaladmin@mail.colostate.edu or call (970) 491-1844.
dc.description.abstractLivestock pastoralism and game ranching are the two dominant land use types in the Eastern Cape, South Africa and conflict between humans and medium sized carnivores is widespread. In this study, we used 12 spatially explicit (3 x 3) trail camera grids (3600ha), to assess the relative abundance indices (RAI) of two common predators; black-backed jackals (Canis mesomelas) and caracals (Caracal caracal). Camera grids were equally distributed across the two land use types. Over 19121 trap nights, 726 photographs of black-backed jackals and 81 photographs of caracals were taken. The RAI of jackals was significantly higher on game ranches than livestock farms (U = 109; df = 1; p < 0.05). In contrast, the RAI of caracals was similar on the two land use types (U = 73; df = 1; p > 0.05). While the two mesopredators are actively removed by managers on both land-use types, removal rates are higher on livestock farms than game ranches. Thus, monogamous, pair-bonded black-backed jackals may be more sensitive to the effects of predator control than solitary caracals. The merits of predator removal as a conflict mitigation strategy are discussed.
dc.format.extent12 minutes 27 seconds
dc.format.mediumborn digital
dc.format.mediummotion pictures (visual works)
dc.format.mediumdigital moving image formats
dc.format.mediumPresentation slides
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10217/86319
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.25675/10217/86319
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherColorado State University. Libraries
dc.relation.ispartofBusiness of Conservation
dc.relation.ispartof8th international wildlife ranching symposium
dc.rightsCopyright and other restrictions may apply. User is responsible for compliance with all applicable laws. For information about copyright law, please see https://libguides.colostate.edu/copyright.
dc.subjectWildlife management -- Congresses
dc.subjectRange management -- Congresses
dc.titleHow does land use affect the relative abundance of two mesopredators in the, Eastern Cape, South Africa?
dc.typeMovingImage
dc.typeText
dc.typeImage

Files