Repository logo
 

Identification and characterization of dendritic, parallel, pinnate, rectangular and trellis networks based on deviations from planform self-similarity

dc.contributor.authorMejía, Alfonso I., author
dc.contributor.authorNiemann, Jeffrey D., advisor
dc.contributor.authorWohl, Ellen, committee member
dc.contributor.authorRamírez, Jorge A., committee member
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-28T21:43:01Z
dc.date.available2022-09-28T21:43:01Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.descriptionCovers not scanned.
dc.descriptionPrint version deaccessioned 2022.
dc.description.abstractGeomorphologists have long recognized that the geometry of channel network planforms can vary significantly between regions depending on the local lithologic and tectonic conditions. This tendency has led to the classification of channel networks using terms such as dendritic, parallel, pinnate, rectangular, and trellis. Unfortunately, available classification methods are scale dependent and have no connection to an underlying quantitative theory of drainage network geometry or evolution. In this study, a new method is developed to classify drainage networks based on their deviations from self-similarity. The planform geometry of dendritic networks is known to be self-similar. It is our hypothesis that parallel, pinnate, rectangular, and trellis networks correspond to distinct deviations from this self-similarity. To identify such deviations, three measures of channel networks are applied to ten networks from each classification. These measures are the incremental accumulation of drainage area along channels, the irregularity of channel courses, and the angles formed by merging channels. The results confirm and characterize the self-similarity of dendritic networks. Parallel and pinnate networks are found to be self-affine with Hurst exponents around 0.8 and 0.7, respectively. Rectangular and trellis networks are approximately self-similar although deviations from self-similarity are observed. Rectangular networks have more sinuous channels than dendritic networks across all scales, and trellis networks have a slower rate of area accumulation than dendritic networks across all scales. Such observations are used to build and test classification trees, which are found to perform well in classifying networks.
dc.format.mediummasters theses
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10217/235797
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherColorado State University. Libraries
dc.relationCatalog record number (MMS ID): 991023622219703361
dc.relationGB401.4.M555 2006
dc.relation.ispartof2000-2019
dc.rightsCopyright and other restrictions may apply. User is responsible for compliance with all applicable laws. For information about copyright law, please see https://libguides.colostate.edu/copyright.
dc.subject.lcshGeomorphology
dc.subject.lcshDrainage
dc.subject.lcshHydrologic models
dc.titleIdentification and characterization of dendritic, parallel, pinnate, rectangular and trellis networks based on deviations from planform self-similarity
dc.typeText
dc.typeStillImage
dcterms.rights.dplaThis Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights (https://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/). You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
thesis.degree.disciplineCivil and Environmental Engineering
thesis.degree.grantorColorado State University
thesis.degree.levelMasters
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Science (M.S.)

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ETDF_2006_Fall_Mejia_Alfonso_I.pdf
Size:
15.89 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format