Identification and characterization of dendritic, parallel, pinnate, rectangular and trellis networks based on deviations from planform self-similarity
| dc.contributor.author | Mejía, Alfonso I., author | |
| dc.contributor.author | Niemann, Jeffrey D., advisor | |
| dc.contributor.author | Wohl, Ellen, committee member | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ramírez, Jorge A., committee member | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-09-28T21:43:01Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-09-28T21:43:01Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2006 | |
| dc.description | Covers not scanned. | |
| dc.description | Print version deaccessioned 2022. | |
| dc.description.abstract | Geomorphologists have long recognized that the geometry of channel network planforms can vary significantly between regions depending on the local lithologic and tectonic conditions. This tendency has led to the classification of channel networks using terms such as dendritic, parallel, pinnate, rectangular, and trellis. Unfortunately, available classification methods are scale dependent and have no connection to an underlying quantitative theory of drainage network geometry or evolution. In this study, a new method is developed to classify drainage networks based on their deviations from self-similarity. The planform geometry of dendritic networks is known to be self-similar. It is our hypothesis that parallel, pinnate, rectangular, and trellis networks correspond to distinct deviations from this self-similarity. To identify such deviations, three measures of channel networks are applied to ten networks from each classification. These measures are the incremental accumulation of drainage area along channels, the irregularity of channel courses, and the angles formed by merging channels. The results confirm and characterize the self-similarity of dendritic networks. Parallel and pinnate networks are found to be self-affine with Hurst exponents around 0.8 and 0.7, respectively. Rectangular and trellis networks are approximately self-similar although deviations from self-similarity are observed. Rectangular networks have more sinuous channels than dendritic networks across all scales, and trellis networks have a slower rate of area accumulation than dendritic networks across all scales. Such observations are used to build and test classification trees, which are found to perform well in classifying networks. | |
| dc.format.medium | masters theses | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10217/235797 | |
| dc.language | English | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.publisher | Colorado State University. Libraries | |
| dc.relation | Catalog record number (MMS ID): 991023622219703361 | |
| dc.relation | GB401.4.M555 2006 | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | 2000-2019 | |
| dc.rights | Copyright and other restrictions may apply. User is responsible for compliance with all applicable laws. For information about copyright law, please see https://libguides.colostate.edu/copyright. | |
| dc.subject | Geomorphology | |
| dc.subject | Drainage | |
| dc.subject | Hydrologic models | |
| dc.title | Identification and characterization of dendritic, parallel, pinnate, rectangular and trellis networks based on deviations from planform self-similarity | |
| dc.type | Text | |
| dc.type | StillImage | |
| dcterms.rights.dpla | This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights (https://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/). You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s). | |
| thesis.degree.discipline | Civil and Environmental Engineering | |
| thesis.degree.grantor | Colorado State University | |
| thesis.degree.level | Masters | |
| thesis.degree.name | Master of Science (M.S.) |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- ETDF_2006_Fall_Mejia_Alfonso_I.pdf
- Size:
- 15.89 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format