Repository logo
 

A comparison of electrocoagulation and chemical coagulation treatment effectiveness on frac flowback and produced water

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorHutcherson, John Ryan, author
dc.contributor.authorCarlson, Ken, advisor
dc.contributor.authorOmur-Ozbek, Pinar, committee member
dc.contributor.authorStednick, John, committee member
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-27T03:57:02Z
dc.date.available2015-08-27T03:57:02Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractDevelopment and production of tight shale for crude oil and natural gas is increasing rapidly throughout the United States and especially in the Wattenberg field of Northern Colorado. Hydraulic fracturing is used to stimulate the shale formation, which allows previously trapped oil and gas to flow to the surface. According to Goodwin (2013), approximately 2.8 million gallons of water are required to hydraulically fracture a horizontal well. Freshwater makes up the vast majority of water used to create these fracturing fluids with a small portion coming from recycling of previously used fracturing fluid. In a semi-arid climate such as Northern Colorado, there are multiple demands for freshwater, often exceeding the supply. Once a well is fractured, water flows back to the surface along with the targeted oil and gas. This fluid is typically referred to as flowback or produced water. In some areas around the United States as much as 10 barrels of water flows to the surface for every barrel of oil recovered. For the purposes of this research, flowback is defined as water that flows to the surface within the first 30 days after fracturing. After fracturing, up to 71% of the water (produced water) used to fracture the well flows back to the surface along with oil and gas, with approximately 27% flowing back in the first 30 days (Bai et al, 2013). The flowback and produced water is currently being disposed of either by deep underground injection or in evaporation ponds. There has been very little effort to capture, recycle, and reuse this flowback or produced water as it has traditionally been considered a waste product. Due to the limited freshwater supply in Colorado, recycling and reuse should be explored in greater detail and with a sense of urgency. The ultimate goal for the oil and gas industry should be to recycle and reuse 100% of flowback and produced water in the creation of hydraulic fracturing fluid for other production wells, creating a closed-loop system. Before flowback and produced water can be reused, treatment of the water is required. Treatment for reuse typically consists of removal of solids, organic compounds, and some inorganic ions. Historically, chemicals have been the dominant method used for coagulation to remove solids, as they are readily available and in many cases can be cheaper than other methods. Electrocoagulation (EC) is now also being considered as a produced water treatment method. EC involves running electric current across metal plates (sacrificial anodes) in a solution, which creates an in situ coagulant dose (Emamjomeh and Sivakumar 2008). There is a time component to water quality changes over the life of a well. Early flowback typically has higher concentration of aluminum, solids, and total organic carbon (TOC) as it is influenced mostly by the makeup of the fracturing fluid. At some point around the 30-day mark, a transition in water quality begins. The formation or connate water seems to have a greater influence on water quality than does the fracturing fluid. Treatment seems to correlate to the changing water quality, as treatment is less effective on the early flowback compared to produced water. TOC and low ionic strength may be the reason early flowback is more difficult to treat. Also, chemical coagulation (CC) is more effective than EC at removing TOC and aluminum in early flowback water compared to EC, while EC is more effective at removing iron. However, both treatments are effective after day 27.
dc.format.mediumborn digital
dc.format.mediummasters theses
dc.identifierHutcherson_colostate_0053N_12878.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10217/166917
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherColorado State University. Libraries
dc.relationwwdl
dc.relation.ispartof2000-2019
dc.rightsCopyright and other restrictions may apply. User is responsible for compliance with all applicable laws. For information about copyright law, please see https://libguides.colostate.edu/copyright.
dc.subjectelectrocoagulation
dc.subjectoil and gas
dc.subjectwater treatment
dc.subjectflowback
dc.subjectchemical coagulation
dc.subjectproduced water
dc.titleA comparison of electrocoagulation and chemical coagulation treatment effectiveness on frac flowback and produced water
dc.typeText
dcterms.rights.dplaThis Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights (https://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/). You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
thesis.degree.disciplineCivil and Environmental Engineering
thesis.degree.grantorColorado State University
thesis.degree.levelMasters
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Science (M.S.)

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Hutcherson_colostate_0053N_12878.pdf
Size:
2.88 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

2000-2019
Theses and Dissertations