Evaluating the effects of an essential oil feed additive on production efficiency, carcass attributes, and beef steak quality in feedlot steers
| dc.contributor.author | Poppy, Christopher R., author | |
| dc.contributor.author | Nair, Mahesh, advisor | |
| dc.contributor.author | Engle, Terry, advisor | |
| dc.contributor.author | Torres-Henderson, Camille, committee member | |
| dc.contributor.author | Casper, David, committee member | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-06-08T10:31:29Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2026 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The antimicrobial and antioxidant properties of essential oil (EO) present them as potential alternatives to conventional feed additives in feedlot cattle. Therefore, the objective of this research was to evaluate the effects of a dietary essential oil blend (EOB), administered alone or in combination with monensin (M) and tylosin (T), on finishing steer growth performance, carcass characteristics, and subsequent meat quality attributes of longissimus lumborum steaks. Four hundred cross-bred steers (initial BW 368.7 ± 11.0 kg) were utilized in a randomized complete block design and assigned to one of five dietary treatments: 1) Control (no additives); 2) EOB (3 g/d); 3) EOB+M+T; 4) M+T; or 5) EOB+M. Performance and carcass data were collected for all steers. Following harvest, two striploins per pen from a subset of pens (n=4/treatment) from the Control, EOB, and M+T treatments were collected, aged for 21 days, and analyzed for a suite of meat quality characteristics. While the overall average daily gain (ADG) was similar (P > 0.10) among treatments for the entire feeding period, steers fed EOB-supplemented diets demonstrated periods of improved early growth. Steers fed Control, and EOB had greater (P < 0.05) overall dry matter intake (DMI) than those fed M+T. Feed efficiency was lowest (P < 0.10) for Control steers compared to all other treatments. Regarding carcass characteristics, steers supplemented with EOB had a greater (P < 0.10) dressing percentage (64.3%) compared to all other treatments. Conversely, the incidence of liver abscesses was lowest (P < 0.10) for steers fed M+T compared to Control, EOB, and EOB+M treatments. In the subsequent meat quality analysis, dietary treatments were similar (P > 0.05) on instrumental color, pH, lipid oxidation, metmyoglobin reducing activity, microbial populations, shear force, or fatty acid profiles of steaks aged for 21 days. These results indicate that supplementing an EOB in finishing steer diets can improve early growth rates and dressing percentage, with feed conversion similar to ionophore-based treatments. However, the EOB did not reduce the incidence of liver abscesses. Furthermore, the EOB inclusion did not influence the quality or shelf-life characteristics of the final meat product. This suggests that essential oil blends may serve as a viable production enhancer in beef finishing systems without altering beef quality attributes. However, they may not fully replace the liver abscess control provided by tylosin. | |
| dc.format.medium | born digital | |
| dc.format.medium | masters theses | |
| dc.identifier | Poppy_colostate_0053N_19413.pdf | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10217/244749 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.25675/3.027109 | |
| dc.language | English | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.publisher | Colorado State University. Libraries | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | 2020- | |
| dc.rights | Copyright and other restrictions may apply. User is responsible for compliance with all applicable laws. For information about copyright law, please see https://libguides.colostate.edu/copyright. | |
| dc.subject | carcass characteristics | |
| dc.subject | feedlot performance | |
| dc.subject | liver abscesses | |
| dc.subject | essential oils | |
| dc.subject | beef cattle | |
| dc.subject | growth performance | |
| dc.title | Evaluating the effects of an essential oil feed additive on production efficiency, carcass attributes, and beef steak quality in feedlot steers | |
| dc.type | Text | |
| dcterms.rights.dpla | This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights (https://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/). You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s). | |
| thesis.degree.discipline | Animal Sciences | |
| thesis.degree.grantor | Colorado State University | |
| thesis.degree.level | Masters | |
| thesis.degree.name | Master of Science (M.S.) |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- Poppy_colostate_0053N_19413.pdf
- Size:
- 453.27 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
