Navigating safe and brave: a report for deliberative centers and educational institutions

Abstract

Safe spaces are characterized by ensuring physical and psychological safety, which is often hard to do. Brave spaces embrace criticism and debating or dialoguing different ideas and perspectives. The conversation between "Safe" and "Brave" spaces has been ongoing for years, with scholars in constant debate over whether one holds precedence and efficacy over the other. Several settings have been examined under the lenses of safe and brave, and the cacophony of research surrounding the subjects suggests adherence to promoting these ideals is applicable in virtually any setting. An examination of pre-existing research on these spaces finds that despite the constant tension between the polarities of safe and brave, to maximize the potential of deliberative discussions, protect freedom of speech, and maintain the physical and psychological well-being of participants, a balanced combination of these terms is needed. Research also shows that certain situations may require an emphasis on one over the other. Thus, this thesis examines the tension between the terms and explores the application and navigation of these terms within Colorado State University's Center for Public Deliberation and beyond. This thesis aims to differentiate between safe and brave spaces and provide individuals with the knowledge and training necessary to know how and when to utilize one "space" over the other.