Repository logo
 

Repatriates: the relationship between bicultural self-efficacy and repatriate difficulty

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorAure, Aaron, author
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-08T20:14:58Z
dc.date.available2022-12-08T20:14:58Z
dc.date.issued2003
dc.descriptionCovers not scanned.
dc.descriptionPrint version deaccessioned 2022.
dc.description.abstractThe study hypothesized a positive influence of bicultural competencies (BC) -- specifically bicultural self-efficacy (BSE) -- on repatriate difficulties (RD) and possible group differences between minority and dominant groups. One hundred and thirty-two students returning from a study abroad experience were used as participants. Students were solicited using e-mail and asked to complete a web survey. The survey consisted of two scales measuring BSE and RD. The survey also collected categorical data including sex, ethnicity, terms spent abroad, terms since return, and fluency in the host country language. The BSE scale (α = .73) was an adapted scale from (Harrison, 1996), and the RD scale (α = . 79) was created from eight RD themes (Osland, 2000). A factor analysis on the RD items resulted in two separate factors, Host Country Comparisons (HCC) and Home Country Specifics (HCS). HCC had an overarching theme of comparing host country experiences with home country experiences. The questions related to HCS had an overarching theme related to RD experiences specific to the context of the home country. A small to medium size positive correlation was found between BSE and one aspect of repatriate difficulty, HCC (p = .005). Statistical significance was not found between the minority and dominant groups. Also, no group differences were found after controlling for categorical variables. The study suggested that BCs have a positive relationship with RD. To further understand these results a post-hoc literature review was completed on five other Bicultural Competencies, which resulted in continued support of the study's hypotheses. Further research will be required to provide additional empirical evidence to either refute or support these initial findings. This study concluded that: (1) BSE and BCs may have a positive relationship with RD. (2) The theory supporting this study might not be accurate, although one study is not adequate to refute such theories. (3) The impact of one BC may not be adequate to provide a clear positive or negative relationship with RD. Including the other 5 Bicultural Competencies may not only show a clear relationship with RD but also help us further understand the concept of BCs.
dc.format.mediumdoctoral dissertations
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10217/235867
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherColorado State University. Libraries
dc.relationCatalog record number (MMS ID): 991018726859703361
dc.relationBF637.S38A87 2003
dc.relation.ispartof2000-2019
dc.rightsCopyright and other restrictions may apply. User is responsible for compliance with all applicable laws. For information about copyright law, please see https://libguides.colostate.edu/copyright.
dc.subject.lcshSelf-efficacy
dc.subject.lcshRepatriation
dc.subject.lcshBiculturalism
dc.titleRepatriates: the relationship between bicultural self-efficacy and repatriate difficulty
dc.typeText
dcterms.rights.dplaThis Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights (https://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/). You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
thesis.degree.disciplineEducation
thesis.degree.grantorColorado State University
thesis.degree.levelDoctoral
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.)

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ETDF_2003_Summer_Aure_Aaron_DIP.pdf
Size:
14.63 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

2000-2019
Theses and Dissertations