Repository logo

Enhancing nutrient removal in bioretention cells: a citywide feasibility and effectiveness study

dc.contributor.authorCipra, Mattheu, author
dc.contributor.authorArabi, Mazdak, advisor
dc.contributor.authorSharvelle, Sybil, committee member
dc.contributor.authorBousselot, Jennifer, committee member
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-12T11:27:42Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractIn 2013, the City of Fort Collins (the City) adopted new stormwater management criteria that encouraged the use of low-impact development (LID) practices, particularly those that promoted filtration and infiltration. As a result of these new criteria, the use of bioretention cells (BRCs), along with other LID technologies, became increasingly common among new developments. However, a field study conducted by the City from 2013 through 2015 observed poor nutrient removal in a newly constructed BRC, prompting further investigations into strategies to enhance nutrient removal. In addition to altering bioretention soil media mix designs, subsequent studies conducted by the City identified two retrofits to enhance the nutrient removal capabilities of existing BRCs: (1) a 0.5-inch surface application of Aluminum Water Treatment Residuals (Al-WTRs); and (2) modifying underdrain systems—with an upturned elbow or vertical riser—with the intent of expanding internal water storage zones (IWSZs) by 6 inches. Amending BRCs with Al-WTRs enhances phosphorus removal, while increasing IWSZs promotes nitrogen removal by supporting denitrification. This study identified 230 existing BRCs across the City, of which, 212 had sufficient documentation to support the development of hydrologic models to evaluate the potential impacts of the proposed retrofits. Ultimately, retrofitting BRCs with Al-WTRs would require 443.34 cubic yards of Al-WTRs and would reduce annual effluent total phosphorus (TP) loads by 46.9% (from 223.26 to 118.57 lbs./yr), while total nitrogen (TN) loads would remain unaffected (1,318.41 lbs./yr). Should BRCs only receive the underdrain retrofit, TP and TN annual effluent loads would be reduced by 2.8% (from 223.26 to 217.09 lbs./yr) and 15.49% (from 1,318.41 to 1,114.25 lbs./yr), respectively. Lastly, combining the two proposed retrofits will further enhance TP reductions to 47.8% (from 223.26 to 116.58 lbs./yr), while TN load reductions will remain at 15.49%. Traditionally, Al-WTRs are disposed of in landfills as they are a waste byproduct from the coagulation-flocculation process at drinking water treatment plants. Repurposing 443.34 cubic yards of Al-WTRs will save the City $17,300 in landfill dumping fees. Unfortunately, these savings do not offset the estimated $40,400 cost associated with retrofitting BRCs with Al-WTRs. Additionally, modifying all existing BRC underdrain systems is estimated to cost $87,500. As a result, the City would need to allocate funds to enhance the nutrient removal capabilities of existing BRCs. Lastly, two Multi-Criteria Decision Analyses were conducted—one for each proposed retrofit—evaluating water quality, economic, and ease of implementation metrics. Using City-assigned measures of importance, two lists were developed to inform the City which BRCs should be prioritized first in future retrofit efforts.
dc.format.mediumborn digital
dc.format.mediummasters theses
dc.identifierCipra_colostate_0053N_19313.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10217/242680
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.25675/3.025572
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherColorado State University. Libraries
dc.relation.ispartof2020-
dc.rightsCopyright and other restrictions may apply. User is responsible for compliance with all applicable laws. For information about copyright law, please see https://libguides.colostate.edu/copyright.
dc.rights.accessEmbargo expires: 01/07/2028.
dc.subjectbioretention cells
dc.subjectnutrient reductions
dc.subjectinternal water storage zones
dc.subjectaluminum water treatment residuals
dc.titleEnhancing nutrient removal in bioretention cells: a citywide feasibility and effectiveness study
dc.typeText
dc.typeImage
dcterms.embargo.expires2028-01-07
dcterms.embargo.terms2028-01-07
dcterms.rights.dplaThis Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights (https://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/). You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
thesis.degree.disciplineCivil and Environmental Engineering
thesis.degree.grantorColorado State University
thesis.degree.levelMasters
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Science (M.S.)

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Cipra_colostate_0053N_19313.pdf
Size:
1.54 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Access status: Embargo until 2028-01-07 , Download