Repository logo
 

The effect of CSA membership on fruit and vegetable intake

dc.contributor.authorHedden, Jessica L., author
dc.contributor.authorAuld, Garry, advisor
dc.contributor.authorBunning, Marisa, committee member
dc.contributor.authorStonaker, Frank, committee member
dc.date.accessioned2007-01-03T05:47:52Z
dc.date.available2007-01-03T05:47:52Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.description.abstractObjective: Increased fruit and vegetable intake has been associated with decreased BMI and disease rates (Ford & Mokdad, 2001; Lin & Morrison, 2002; Liu, 2000; Newby, et al., 2003; Riboli & Norat, 2003). Multiple barriers inhibit fruit and vegetable consumption, including the availability in the U.S. (Pollard, et al., 2002). Currently, there are many forms of alternative food networks (AFNs) such as farmers markets, community gardens and community supported agriculture (CSAs) providing local, seasonal produce to consumers, attempting to address availability and provide other outlets for fresh produce. This study examines the influences that CSA membership may have on fruit and vegetable intake. Methods and Materials: Sixty-one participants were recruited from an average-sized CSA (<100 members; CSU), a large CSA (>2000 members; GFF), and non-CSA members (NON- as a control group). Three, 24-hour dietary recalls were collected by phone to estimate the produce components of each participant's diet over 6 months during the 2010 CSA season. Each diet was quantified based on the amount and variety of fruit, vegetables, total fruit and vegetables, and leafy greens. Results: The groups were very similar in fruit and vegetable consumption at baseline. At the peak of CSA season (T2), GFF participants were consuming more vegetables (2.96 [0.26]) and more total fruits and vegetables (4.45 [0.40]) than NON participants (2.16 [0.29], p<0.1; 3.38 [0.45] p<0.1, respectively). Both CSU and GFF participants had an increased variety of vegetables over NON participants (p<0.01 and p<0.001, respectively) and participants from both CSAs had higher total variety (p<0.01) at Time 2. Conclusions/Implications: From this study, variety was the major dietary difference in produce intake between both CSA groups and the control group. Demographic characteristics of participants were similar, indicating that the observed changes were likely a true relationship. A diet with increased variety of fruits and vegetables has been associated with increased health benefits, having the potential to reduce disease rates (Wirt & Collins, 2009). More studies need to be conducted examining larger study populations, the potential effect CSAs may have on low-income populations, and other forms of alternative food networks, such as farmers markets or community gardens.
dc.format.mediumborn digital
dc.format.mediummasters theses
dc.identifierHedden_colostate_0053N_10480.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10217/51796
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherColorado State University. Libraries
dc.relation.ispartof2000-2019
dc.rightsCopyright and other restrictions may apply. User is responsible for compliance with all applicable laws. For information about copyright law, please see https://libguides.colostate.edu/copyright.
dc.subjectcommunity supported agriculture
dc.subjectvegetable
dc.subjectvariety
dc.subjectfruit
dc.subjectconsumption
dc.titleThe effect of CSA membership on fruit and vegetable intake
dc.typeText
dcterms.rights.dplaThis Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights (https://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/). You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
thesis.degree.disciplineFood Science and Human Nutrition
thesis.degree.grantorColorado State University
thesis.degree.levelMasters
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Science (M.S.)

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Hedden_colostate_0053N_10480.pdf
Size:
862.52 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: