Repository logo
 

Oral language structure: success for first grade students in a reading intervention program

dc.contributor.authorSangster, Mary B., author
dc.contributor.authorCooner, Donna, advisor
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-13T20:27:56Z
dc.date.available2024-03-13T20:27:56Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.description.abstractThe relationship between oral language and reading was established through research in the late 1960s, and today there is little disagreement concerning the interconnectedness of language and reading. Which oral language skills, the strength of the relationships, and how that information informs practice are the present forums of discussion. Phonology and the impact of phonemic awareness as a predictor of reading ability have been the center of most discussions in the reading-language relationship. There is research indicating other non-phonological measures are also sound predictor of successful reading. These measures include vocabulary, grammar or oral language structure, and narration. In examining the language-reading relationship many studies include students diagnosed with speech/language development/impairment issues and their literacy development or students diagnosed with reading disabilities and their reading disabilities. This is a correlational study examining the relationship among complexity of oral language structure and (a) text levels for first grade students (n = 244) participating in the Reading Recovery® intervention program; (b) the number of lessons to successfully complete the Reading Recovery® intervention program. The Record of Oral Language of Clay and colleagues (1999) and scoring transcriptions of audiotapes of students retelling a story were used to assess oral language structure. The Observation Survey battery of assessments was used to determine end-of-program success. Pearson's correlation coefficient and bivariate linear regression were used to determine the relationships between variables. A positive and significant relationship was found between oral language structure and text levels (r = .179). The correlation between oral language structure and number of lessons needed to successfully complete the Reading Recovery® program was -.165. When controlling phonological awareness, there was little change in the correlation score between oral language scores and exit text levels. This study confirmed previous research that there is more than one correlation in a variety of skill areas to reading success. The consistency of oral language structure's significant correlation to reading success suggests the need for more interaction among speech teachers, with their knowledge of language structure, and classroom teachers, special education teachers, and reading teachers. Professional development in making the connection between oral language assessments and application of the research findings in daily instruction of children appears to be needed. Studies evaluating the impact of direct teaching to oral language structure and reading success are recommended.
dc.format.mediumborn digital
dc.format.mediumdoctoral dissertations
dc.identifierETDF_Sangster_2008_3332731.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10217/237940
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherColorado State University. Libraries
dc.relation.ispartof2000-2019
dc.rightsCopyright and other restrictions may apply. User is responsible for compliance with all applicable laws. For information about copyright law, please see https://libguides.colostate.edu/copyright.
dc.rights.licensePer the terms of a contractual agreement, all use of this item is limited to the non-commercial use of Colorado State University and its authorized users.
dc.subjectgrammar
dc.subjectobservation survey
dc.subjectoral language
dc.subjectoral language structure
dc.subjectreading recovery
dc.subjectrecord of oral language
dc.subjectliteracy
dc.subjectlanguage
dc.titleOral language structure: success for first grade students in a reading intervention program
dc.typeText
dcterms.rights.dplaThis Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights (https://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/). You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
thesis.degree.disciplineEducation
thesis.degree.grantorColorado State University
thesis.degree.levelDoctoral
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.)

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ETDF_Sangster_2008_3332731.pdf
Size:
1.37 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format