Repository logo
 

Dataset associated with “What’s in a name? The paradox of citizen science and community science”

Abstract

Citizen science has expanded ecological and environmental sciences by making possible studies across greater spatial and temporal scales while incorporating local expertise and interests that might otherwise be overlooked. Broadly, citizen science involves the public in the process of science. However, it continues to struggle to engage diverse participants. Citizen science project coordinators are increasingly trying to promote inclusivity by rebranding as “community science” to avoid the term “citizen.” Rebranding efforts, while well-intentioned, are uninformed by research, as we lack an evidenced-based understanding of these terms. We distributed a survey to those who participate in citizen and community science. We found differences in how well known and accepted the terms are, who is perceived as initiating and benefiting from the projects, and associated levels of inclusivity. Our findings have important implications for those involved in citizen and community science seeking to better describe projects in the future.

Description

The dataset contains survey data collected from those involved in citizen and community science. It was collected to determine differences in how this community perceives the terms "citizen science" and "community science." It includes two files: a README file and a spreadsheet contain the data.
Department of Biology
Graduate Degree Program in Ecology
Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory (NREL)

Rights Access

Subject

citizen science
community science
inclusivity
diversity
environmental communication
science communication
evidence-based practice

Citation

Associated Publications

Lin Hunter, D. E., G. J. Newman, & M. M. Balgopal. 2023. What’s in a name? The paradox of citizen science and community science. Front Ecol Environ 21: 244-250, https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2635