Repository logo
 

Colorado's secondary school programs of agricultural education: perceptions of sustainability

dc.contributor.authorEnns, Kellie Jo, author
dc.contributor.authorLehmann, Jean P., advisor
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-13T19:26:15Z
dc.date.available2024-03-13T19:26:15Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.description.abstractAgricultural education (Ag Ed) is faced with unique challenges; competition for scarce resources, teacher retention, and quality programmatic offerings are dilemmas within the profession. A rapidly changing agriculture industry and societal shift away from agrarian lifestyles complicates the Ag Ed culture. These challenges indicate it is a prudent time to study sustainability of Ag Ed in Colorado. The purpose of the study was fourfold: first to understand if Colorado Ag Ed programs are perceived sustainable; second, to determine the characteristics of important resources in agricultural education; third, to determine the association of resources to program sustainability; and finally, to understand demographics that might predict sustainability. Knowledge of sustainability may help policy makers to develop models for programs consistent with state and national strategic growth initiatives. Perceptions were gathered from three groups of Ag Ed stakeholders in the 2007-2008 school-year: teachers (n = 96), administrators (n = 64) and community members (n = 65). Agricultural education in Colorado is perceived to be sustainable. Sustainability was ranked on a 10 point scale (1 = Very Sustainable to 10 = Very Unsustainable), M = 2.32, N = 204, SD = 1.37. Program resources were characterized according to the perceptions of stakeholders. Utilizing Spearman's Rho statistic, the effectiveness of Ag Ed resources of Organization and Instructional Content (rs = .399), FFA and Leadership Development (rs = .305), SAE and Experiential Learning (rs = .403), the Agriculture Teacher (rs = .337), Program Management (rs = .453) and Program Support (rs = .454) were positively correlated to sustainability. The Kruskal-Wallis test determined if differences existed in the three stakeholder groups perceptions of sustainability. The groups showed no significant differences regarding perception of Ag Ed program sustainability, χ2 (2, N = 204) = 4.875, p = .087. Demographic data and sustainability perceptions were utilized in a simultaneous multiple regression equation. The combination of variables to predict sustainability was statistically significant, F(5,134) = 7.167, p < .000. Demographic characteristics of School Enrollment, Ag Ed Enrollment, and Ag Industry Outlook significantly predict sustainability when all variables are included. The adjusted R2 value was .172. This indicates that this model explains about 17 percent of the variance in sustainability.
dc.format.mediumborn digital
dc.format.mediumdoctoral dissertations
dc.identifierETDF_Enns_2008_3321275.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10217/237712
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherColorado State University. Libraries
dc.relation.ispartof2000-2019
dc.rightsCopyright and other restrictions may apply. User is responsible for compliance with all applicable laws. For information about copyright law, please see https://libguides.colostate.edu/copyright.
dc.rights.licensePer the terms of a contractual agreement, all use of this item is limited to the non-commercial use of Colorado State University and its authorized users.
dc.subjectagriculture teachers
dc.subjectColorado
dc.subjectFFA and leadership development
dc.subjectFuture Farmers of America
dc.subjectorganization and instructional content
dc.subjectprogram support and management
dc.subjectSAE and experiential learning
dc.subjectsecondary school
dc.subjectsupervised agricultural experience
dc.subjecttotal program
dc.subjectagricultural education
dc.subjectsecondary schools
dc.subjectperceptions
dc.subjectsustainability
dc.titleColorado's secondary school programs of agricultural education: perceptions of sustainability
dc.typeText
dcterms.rights.dplaThis Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights (https://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/). You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
thesis.degree.disciplineEducation
thesis.degree.grantorColorado State University
thesis.degree.levelDoctoral
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.)

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ETDF_Enns_2008_3321275.pdf
Size:
4.39 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format