Repository logo
 

Sustaining nature, transforming society: rethinking sustainability through radical ecopolitical thought

dc.contributor.authorMeans, Morgann K. R., author
dc.contributor.authorMacdonald, Bradley, advisor
dc.contributor.authorStevis, Dimitris, committee member
dc.contributor.authorTrembath, Paul, committee member
dc.date.accessioned2007-01-03T05:55:44Z
dc.date.available2007-01-03T05:55:44Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.description.abstractSustainability represents a central idea in environmental political thought that provides a conceptual framework for constructing, discussing, and judging the viability of solutions for ecological degradation. Despite the recent predilection for perceiving sustainability as a powerful discursive construct capable of capturing the pursuit of economic prosperity, societal well-being, and ecological vitality within a unified political project, the definition of the notion remains ambiguous and contested throughout the literature. This ambiguity has resulted in concern over the viability of the sustainability concept to induce beneficial transformation and has led to suggestions that the notion is rapidly losing its meaning as a coherent program for environmentally and socially positive change. In response to the ambiguity present in discussions of sustainability and the resulting concern over the diminishing meaning and significance of the term, this thesis constructs a typological analysis of sustainability. It divides the concept into three analytic categories—sustainability as a goal, as a human right, and as a need—in order to critically evaluate the multi-faceted articulations of the term within reformist environmental discourse. Identifying the common objectives of the typological categories, as well as the clear differences between the three reformist discourses regarding the impetus behind sustainability and the agents and processes involved in the transition to a sustainable condition, this thesis critically challenges reformist conceptualizations of sustainability. It then explores three radical ecopolitical discourses—ecocentrism, social ecology, and ecofeminism—in order to examine their potential to re-imagine sustainability and establish coherent conceptual boundaries for its realization. The final chapter of this thesis evaluates the feasibility of the radical ecopolitical paradigms by discussing potential openings for each position to enter into the existing conversation regarding human-nature interactions and to fundamentally restructure the objectives of sustainability, as well as the agents and processes involved in its pursuit.
dc.format.mediumborn digital
dc.format.mediummasters theses
dc.identifierMeans_colostate_0053N_11769.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10217/80271
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherColorado State University. Libraries
dc.relation.ispartof2000-2019
dc.rightsCopyright and other restrictions may apply. User is responsible for compliance with all applicable laws. For information about copyright law, please see https://libguides.colostate.edu/copyright.
dc.subjectecocentrism
dc.subjectecofeminism
dc.subjectecopolitics
dc.subjectenvironmental theory
dc.subjectsocial ecology
dc.subjectsustainability
dc.titleSustaining nature, transforming society: rethinking sustainability through radical ecopolitical thought
dc.typeText
dcterms.rights.dplaThis Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights (https://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/). You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
thesis.degree.disciplinePolitical Science
thesis.degree.grantorColorado State University
thesis.degree.levelMasters
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Arts (M.A.)

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Means_colostate_0053N_11769.pdf
Size:
846.86 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: