Repository logo
 

Coactions of bitterbrush, ponderosa pine, and herbaceous vegetation

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorGiunta, Bruce Conrad, author
dc.contributor.authorMogren, Edwin W., advisor
dc.contributor.authorVan Dyne, George M., committee member
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-06T17:41:35Z
dc.date.available2021-12-06T17:41:35Z
dc.date.issued1968
dc.descriptionCovers not scanned.
dc.descriptionPrint version deaccessioned 2021.
dc.description.abstractDuring 1966 and 1967, 100 bitterbrush (Purshia tridentata) plants were collected on each of six study areas located approximately 30 miles west of Fort Collins, Colorado. Study areas were selected to provide varying levels of abundance of bitterbrush, ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa), and herbaceous vegetation. The object was to relate bitterbrush age structures, growth, and vigor to plant c o actions. Bitterbrush plants were aged by ring count. Living and dead portions of the crown were weighed separately. Various measurements were made at each bitterbrush plant and on the plot where it occurred. These were intended to relate the shrub component to herbaceous cover and indices of ponderosa pine abundance. Grasses were the most important herbaceous component on all study areas. Ponderosa pine varied from 0 ft /acre on study area three to 102 ft /acre of basal area on area six. Sexual regeneration of bitterbrush appears rare on all study areas, but especially where a pine canopy is absent. Asexual reproduction by layering was common. A chi-square test of homogeneity comparing age structures between study areas yielded significant results. However, no relationship between age structure and pine or herbaceous abundance was evident. Three of the study areas appear to have declining bitterbrush stands. Investigations of growth rate revealed that bitterbrush may experience a peak growth rate that is at least partially controlled by age. Multiple regression analysis indicated that growth rate is inversely related to ponderosa pine basal area. Bitterbrush plants of a given age are almost always larger in open stands than under a canopy. No relationship with herbaceous cover could be detected. Attempts to quantify bitterbrush vigor were a failure, because of extreme variation in percent dead crown material between plants. Crown die back could not be related to pine or herbaceous abundance. Current annual growth production of bitterbrush seems inversely related to herbaceous cover and the percent of dead crown material present.
dc.format.mediummasters theses
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10217/234085
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherColorado State University. Libraries
dc.relationMMS ID: 991003654859703000
dc.relationSB207.P87 G5
dc.relation.ispartof1950-1979
dc.relation.isreferencedbyMeiman, James R. Little South Poudre Watershed and Pingree Park Campus. Colorado State University, College of Forestry and Natural Resources (1971). http://hdl.handle.net/10217/70382
dc.rightsCopyright and other restrictions may apply. User is responsible for compliance with all applicable laws. For information about copyright law, please see https://libguides.colostate.edu/copyright.
dc.subject.lcshPurshia tridentata
dc.subject.lcshPonderosa pine
dc.titleCoactions of bitterbrush, ponderosa pine, and herbaceous vegetation
dc.typeText
dcterms.rights.dplaThis Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights (https://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/). You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
thesis.degree.disciplineFishery and Wildlife Biology
thesis.degree.grantorColorado State University
thesis.degree.levelMasters
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Science (M.S.)

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ETDF_1968_August_Giunta_Bruce_Conrad.pdf
Size:
18.1 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

1950-1979