Repository logo
 

A comparison of theoretical and observed radiances from non-precipitating cumulus clouds

dc.contributor.authorDeMaria, Mark, author
dc.contributor.authorMcKee, Thomas B., author
dc.contributor.authorDepartment of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, publisher
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-14T19:26:28Z
dc.date.available2016-07-14T19:26:28Z
dc.date.issued1979-06
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 82-83).
dc.descriptionJune 1979.
dc.description.abstractRelative radiances from a theoretical model for the scattering of solar radiation by finite clouds were compared to observed radiances from the sides of non-precipitating cumulus clouds. The sides of 5 cumulus clouds ranging from 1-3 km in depth with width to depth ratios of about 1.5 were scanned with an aircraft mounted radiometer sensitive in the spectral range of 0.65 to 0.95 μm. Photographs of each cloud were taken just before each scan with a camera optically aligned with the radiometer. The theoretical model uses the Monte Carlo method of radiative transfer for finite clouds ·in the shape of rectangular parallelepipeds. The radiometer field of view intercepted a circular spot with a diameter of about 1/20 of the cloud height. On this scale the radiometer scans were strongly affected by small scale cloud features so that the model radiances which are averages over a smooth cloud face did not compare well. A linear regression between the model and actual relative radiances resulted in a correlation coefficient (r) of only 0.47. When each scan was averaged, the smaller scale cloud features became less important. A linear regression for scan averages resulted in a correlation coefficient of 0.64. On this scale, the model calculations were verified by the observations except for a few observations where smaller scale cloud features and model cloud corners were important. Elimination of the data points related to cloud features not contained in the model resulted in a correlation coefficient of 0.86. When several successive scans were averaged together, the correlation coefficient increased to 0.91. On this scale, the effects of the smaller scale cloud features and model cloud corners became noticeably less important. The variability in relative radiance from the sides of the clouds was also studied. An upper limit for the relative radiance variations in the observed clouds was estimated from film density to be by a factor of between four and five. Variations of radiance were less for the smaller clouds. The radiance variations of the clouds gradually decreased as the diameter of the area viewed increased from 10 m to 800 m. Most radiance variations were resolved on the scale of 100 m with the radiometer.
dc.description.sponsorshipSponsored by the Global Atmospheric Research Program, National Science Foundation, and the GATE Project Office, NOAA - ATM76-80568.
dc.format.mediumreports
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10217/173566
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherColorado State University. Libraries
dc.relationCatalog record number (MMS ID): 991023635949703361
dc.relationQC852.C6 no.313
dc.relation.ispartofAtmospheric Science Papers (Blue Books)
dc.relation.ispartofAtmospheric science paper, no. 313
dc.rightsCopyright and other restrictions may apply. User is responsible for compliance with all applicable laws. For information about copyright law, please see https://libguides.colostate.edu/copyright.
dc.subject.lcshAtmospheric radiation -- Measurement
dc.subject.lcshRadiative transfer -- Measurement
dc.titleA comparison of theoretical and observed radiances from non-precipitating cumulus clouds
dc.typeText
dcterms.rights.dplaThis Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights (https://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/). You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
FACF_0313_Bluebook.pdf
Size:
2.98 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format