The challenge of the new millennium: Holmes Rolston III asks whether reasoned behaviour is possible in the midst of self-seeking ideologies and ancient appetites
Date
2012
Authors
Rolston, Holmes, 1932-, author
The Philosophers' Magazine, publisher
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Abstract
The biological sciences have developed dramatically in the last half century, raising concerns about their implications for human nature and behavior. While such research can and ought to shape policy, policy equally should critique such research. Science, as much as any other human institution, needs its humanist critics--ethicists, philosophers, theologians, policymakers. We analyze a half-dozen claims coming from biological sciences hoping to demonstrate that half-truths, if taken for the whole, can be both misleading and dangerous. Fortunately scientists are also good at being their own critics. 1. Selfish genes. 2. Genetic destiny. 3. Pleistocene appetites. 4. Monkey's mind. 5. Neuroscience: Bottom up? Top down? 6. Enlightening/escalating self-interest. 7. Ideology: Reasoned governing behavior.
Description
Rights Access
Subject
genes and behavior
science policy
half-truths
bioscience
human behavior
neuroscience
science and values
governing science