Repository logo
 

A cross sector evaluation comparing nutrient removal strategies in urban water systems

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorHodgson, Brock, author
dc.contributor.authorSharvelle, Sybil, advisor
dc.contributor.authorArabi, Mazdak, committee member
dc.contributor.authorCarlson, Ken, committee member
dc.contributor.authorHoag, Dana, committee member
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-14T17:06:45Z
dc.date.available2019-06-14T17:06:45Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractWater supply management and reduction of nutrient pollution from urban water systems are two of the most important issues facing utility managers today. To better protect water supplies, many states have or are establishing total nitrogen (TN) and/or total phosphorous (TP) loading restrictions from urban water systems. Traditionally, these targets are met by wastewater treatment facility (WWTF) improvements, but stringent regulations can make this challenging and costly. As regulations increase it may be necessary or more cost effective to consider additional options for nutrient removal from urban water systems including water management practices or stormwater control measures (SCMs). There are a wide range treatment approaches that can be considered at a WWTF for improving nutrient removal but evaluating these scenarios can be challenging and is traditionally accomplished via mechanistic models specific to individual WWTFs requiring process expertise and a rigorous sampling and analysis program. Water management practices are traditionally considered for water supply improvement, however there is little research to characterize the impact on water quality. There is a need for additional research and tools that facilitate estimating effectiveness of various nutrient removal technologies and consider cross sector strategies and tradeoffs between adoption of practices. To understand the impacts of water management practices, the impact of indoor conservation, source separation, and graywater and effluent reuse on WWTF influent and effluent and downstream water quality was characterized identifying which practices can potentially help meet nutrient reduction targets. For WWTF technologies, previously calibrated and validated mechanistic models were used to develop a simplified empirical model to more easily estimate and compare the effectiveness of various WWTF technologies as a function of influent wastewater quality. The findings from the water management practice evaluation and WWTF treatment comparison provided the framework for conducting an urban water systems evaluation by using the developed empirical models combined with the benefit of stormwater control measures (SCMs) characterized via the Simple Method to evaluate a multitude of strategies for meeting nutrient removal targets in the urban water system. Lastly, this research considered the impacts on biosolids management with the increase of liquid stream removal at the WWTF. The research identified source separation and effluent reuse as frequent part of effective nutrient removal strategies and part of an optimal nutrient removal strategy, and even necessary under stringent nutrient requirements. In terms of wastewater treatment, the benefit of adopting more advanced wastewater treatment processes will be most beneficial in carbon limited WWTFs, and negligible when there is adequate carbon for biological nitrogen and phosphorous removal. This includes sophisticated processes like nitrite shunt and 5-Stage Bardenpho and sidestream processes like struvite precipitation and ammonia stripping. While improvements to WWTF are likely with adoption of stringent nutrient regulations a multi objective optimization identified water management practices and SCMs to be part of all non-dominated nutrient removal strategies. As nutrient requirements become more stringent, the options for WWTFs in terms of processes are limited and frequently a combination of water management practices and SCMs is necessary. This was demonstrated via a systems analysis of cost-effective nutrient removal solutions in urban water systems that can be easily applied to other urban systems because of the empirical models developed with this research. These tools are necessary to help utility managers identify optimal nutrient removal strategies. As utilities invest in improvements to WWTF operations, there may also be notable impacts on biosolids management, primarily in terms of phosphorous, which may limit land application rates resulting in additional cost or disposal of biosolids that historically have been beneficially used in agriculture. These impacts must also be considered by utility managers when considering optimal nutrient removal strategies from urban water systems.
dc.format.mediumborn digital
dc.format.mediumdoctoral dissertations
dc.identifierHodgson_colostate_0053A_15435.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10217/195388
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherColorado State University. Libraries
dc.relation.ispartof2000-2019
dc.rightsCopyright and other restrictions may apply. User is responsible for compliance with all applicable laws. For information about copyright law, please see https://libguides.colostate.edu/copyright.
dc.subjectstormwater control
dc.subjectwater management
dc.subjectwastewater treatment
dc.subjectnutrient pollution
dc.titleA cross sector evaluation comparing nutrient removal strategies in urban water systems
dc.typeText
dcterms.rights.dplaThis Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights (https://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/). You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
thesis.degree.disciplineCivil and Environmental Engineering
thesis.degree.grantorColorado State University
thesis.degree.levelDoctoral
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.)

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Hodgson_colostate_0053A_15435.pdf
Size:
2.1 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

2000-2019
Theses and Dissertations