Repository logo

The value of water in the Fish-Sundays scheme of South Africa

dc.contributor.authorConradie, Beatrice I., author
dc.contributor.authorHoag, Dana L., advisor
dc.contributor.authorFrasier, W. Marshall, advisor
dc.contributor.authorGates, Tim K., committee member
dc.contributor.authorEckert, Jerry B., committee member
dc.date.accessioned2026-05-19T18:02:44Z
dc.date.issued2002
dc.description.abstractThis study analyses the economic efficiency of water allocation on the Fish-Sundays scheme in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa. The objective is to develop a basin-wide model of water use that calculates total and marginal water value. Estimates of total value are used to confirm financial feasibility while marginal values measure the efficiency of current allocation as well as gains from reallocation. A linear programming model shadow prices commercial irrigation, which controls 97 percent of available water on the scheme as a first attempt to value an ecological reserve, irrigation equity and municipal demand. Total water value is defined as residual farm profit after all fixed resources have been remunerated at their opportunity cost. Risk is introduced through MOTAD, which penalises the objective function by an exogenous weighting according to risk preference. Accounting for risk reduces total and marginal water values, which are also sensitive to the value of crops and input prices. Total water value for the scheme is estimated to be R27 million in 1999 Rand (± S2.24 million) and irrigation shadow prices range from zero to R0.2115/m3 (± $0.0176/m3). Results indicate that 77 million m3/year can be transferred out of irrigation at zero opportunity cost. Two thirds of the current allocation to irrigation can be bid away at a price of R0.0352/m3 (± $0.003/m3). Thus equity objectives can be satisfied at zero or very low opportunity cost to commercial irrigation. The typical model of water value relies on a vast array of assumptions that all influence final values. While orders of magnitude and directions of reallocation are therefore meaningful, one should not attach too much meaning to any particular result. Administered prices are too data intensive to be practical. Water markets represent a more reliable and cost effective institutions to derive subjective willingness to pay.
dc.format.mediumdoctoral dissertations
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10217/244575
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.25675/3.027024
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherColorado State University. Libraries
dc.relation.ispartof2000-2019
dc.rightsCopyright and other restrictions may apply. User is responsible for compliance with all applicable laws. For information about copyright law, please see https://libguides.colostate.edu/copyright.
dc.rights.licensePer the terms of a contractual agreement, all use of this item is limited to the non-commercial use of Colorado State University and its authorized users.
dc.subjectwater resources
dc.subjectirrigation
dc.subjectstudies
dc.subjectSouth African studies
dc.subjectAfrican literature
dc.subjectdams
dc.subjectlivestock
dc.subjectcitrus fruits
dc.subjectcrops
dc.subjectdrinking water
dc.subjectlow income groups
dc.subjectfarms
dc.subjectcopyright
dc.subjectlinear programming
dc.subjectrivers
dc.subjecthouseholds
dc.titleThe value of water in the Fish-Sundays scheme of South Africa
dc.typeText
dcterms.rights.dplaThis Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights (https://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/). You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
thesis.degree.disciplineAgricultural and Resource Economics
thesis.degree.grantorColorado State University
thesis.degree.levelDoctoral
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.)

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ETDF_PQ_2002_3053416.pdf
Size:
11.13 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format