Repository logo

National, state and local economic influences of United States environmental policy and animal agriculture

dc.contributor.authorPark, Dooho, author
dc.contributor.authorSeidl, Andrew F., advisor
dc.contributor.authorDavies, Stephen P., advisor
dc.contributor.authorFrasier, W. Marshall, committee member
dc.contributor.authorDavis, Jessica G., committee member
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-23T17:29:49Z
dc.date.issued2002
dc.description.abstractMy dissertation attempts to test the relationship between the US livestock industry and environmental policy in two distinct areas: In Part 1, the potential influence of difference in state level environmental policy on the location and inventory decisions across four principal livestock sub-industries is evaluated; beef cattle, dairies, poultry and hogs. In Part 2, I use a spatial hedonic approach to estimate the influence of livestock operations on residential housing prices in a fast growing, but traditionally agricultural area of Northern Colorado.
dc.description.abstractResults from Part 1 indicate that, in general, traditional economic factors are still important to farm level inventory decision making, but their influence varies across operation size. There are distinct effects of written stringency and evidence of the willingness to enforce environmental policy. Policy enforcement activity was shown to influence stocking decisions, and the impact was more sensitive on larger than smaller operations. Further, environmental policy’s influence differs by livestock species. The hog industry, with rapid structural change, is more sensitive than the beef industry, with less structural change, to changes in the policy milieu.
dc.description.abstractResults from Part 2 indicate that the number of beef and dairy operations positively influence real estate values, potentially signaling a positive rural lifestyle effect. However, the number of hog and sheep operations has the opposite effect. In addition, the influence of the livestock sector on housing prices differs by house value. The cheaper the house, the more negative is the impact of an additional livestock operation. On the other hand, the higher the housing value, the more negative is the impact of more animals, or size of operation rather than number of operations. As expected, impacts decrease with increasing distance from the housing unit to the livestock operation.
dc.format.mediumborn digital
dc.format.mediumdoctoral dissertations
dc.identifierETDF_2002_Park_3075373.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10217/242861
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.25675/3.025718
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherColorado State University. Libraries
dc.relation.ispartof2000-2019
dc.rightsCopyright and other restrictions may apply. User is responsible for compliance with all applicable laws. For information about copyright law, please see https://libguides.colostate.edu/copyright.
dc.rights.licensePer the terms of a contractual agreement, all use of this item is limited to the non-commercial use of Colorado State University and its authorized users.
dc.subjectlivestock
dc.subjectenvironmental science
dc.subjectinfluence
dc.subjectenvironmental policy
dc.subjectstudies
dc.subjectanimal sciences
dc.titleNational, state and local economic influences of United States environmental policy and animal agriculture
dc.typeText
dcterms.rights.dplaThis Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights (https://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/). You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
thesis.degree.disciplineAgricultural and Resource Economics
thesis.degree.grantorColorado State University
thesis.degree.levelDoctoral
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.)

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ETDF_2002_Park_3075373.pdf
Size:
4.87 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format