A three-valued interpretation for a relevance logic

dc.contributor.author	Johnson, Fred (Frederick A.), author
dc.contributor.author	Department of Philosophical Studies, Southern Illinois University at Edwardsville, publisher
dc.date.accessioned	2007-01-03T07:14:39Z
dc.date.available	2007-01-03T07:14:39Z
dc.date.issued	1976-09
dc.description	Not digitized by CSUL Digital Services.
dc.description.abstract	In this paper an entailment relation which holds between certain propositions of the propositional calculus will be defined both syntactically and semantically. Some theorems about this relation will show why one could not follow Lewis to prove that a contradiction entails, for the notion of entailment discussed below, every proposition.
dc.format.medium	articles
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation	Johnson, Frederick A., A Three-Valued Interpretation for a Relevance Logic, The Relevance Logic Newsletter 1, no. 3 (September 1976): 123-128.
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10217/85941
dc.language	English
dc.language.iso	eng
dc.publisher	Colorado State University. Libraries
dc.relation.ispartof	Faculty Publications
dc.rights	©1976 Southern Illinois University at Edwardsville, Department of Philosophical Studies.
dc.rights	Copyright and other restrictions may apply. User is responsible for compliance with all applicable laws. For information about copyright law, please see https://libguides.colostate.edu/copyright.
dc.subject	entailment relation
dc.title	A three-valued interpretation for a relevance logic
dc.type	Text

Files

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1