Repository logo
 

Snowmelt and rainfall runoff in burned and unburned catchments at the intermittent-persistent snow transition, Colorado Front Range

dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Adam, author
dc.contributor.authorKampf, Stephanie, advisor
dc.contributor.authorFassnacht, Steven, committee member
dc.contributor.authorNiemann, Jeffrey, committee member
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-13T14:50:29Z
dc.date.available2016-07-13T14:50:29Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractWinter snowmelt and summer monsoonal rains are the dominant sources for streamflow in the Colorado Front Range, and wildfire can greatly affect the hydrologic regime through which these inputs are delivered to the stream. However, the specific changes to the hydrologic processes that drive runoff production made by wildfire are not clearly understood. This research examines how wildfire affects the timing and magnitude of runoff production from snowmelt and rainfall by comparing four catchments in and near the High Park Fire area, two burned and two unburned, at the intermittent-persistent snow transition. Catchments were instrumented to monitor snow accumulation and ablation, rainfall, soil moisture, soil and air temperature, and streamflow response throughout water year 2015. These data were then utilized to determine the primary mechanisms of seasonal runoff generation and the magnitude of that runoff from each catchment. Runoff remained very low at all catchments during winter months. Spring snowmelt runoff in the form of lateral subsurface flow dominated catchment hydrographs for the water year. Following spring snowmelt, runoff production transitioned to a rainfall-dominated, drier summer period. During this time, limited infiltration excess overland flow was produced from high intensity rainfall events. Results of this research suggest that the loss of canopy cover due to wildfire may result in increased snowpack density and more intermittent snowpack throughout the winter months. Burned monitoring sites also maintained higher soil moisture than unburned sites, but this may be a function of site-specific variability rather than burning. Elevated soil moisture at burned sites did not translate to consistently higher runoff production. Both total runoff production and runoff ratios were highest in the high elevation unburned site with the highest snow persistence and the lowest elevation burned site with low snow persistence. During the one high intensity rain event that affected all catchments, burned catchments experienced an increase in discharge above baseflow of a greater magnitude than unburned sites. Overall, all catchments monitored showed site specific characteristics that defied easy classification but illustrated local variability in the hydrologic variables monitored.
dc.format.mediumborn digital
dc.format.mediummasters theses
dc.identifierJohnson_colostate_0053N_13596.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10217/173551
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherColorado State University. Libraries
dc.relation.ispartof2000-2019
dc.rightsCopyright and other restrictions may apply. User is responsible for compliance with all applicable laws. For information about copyright law, please see https://libguides.colostate.edu/copyright.
dc.subjectprecipitation
dc.subjectwildfire
dc.subjectsnow
dc.subjecthydrology
dc.titleSnowmelt and rainfall runoff in burned and unburned catchments at the intermittent-persistent snow transition, Colorado Front Range
dc.typeText
dcterms.rights.dplaThis Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights (https://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/). You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
thesis.degree.disciplineEcosystem Science and Sustainability
thesis.degree.grantorColorado State University
thesis.degree.levelMasters
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Science (M.S.)

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Johnson_colostate_0053N_13596.pdf
Size:
2.93 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format