Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRolston, Holmes, 1932-
dc.date.accessioned2007-01-03T04:32:05Z
dc.date.available2007-01-03T04:32:05Z
dc.date.issued1996
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references.
dc.descriptionText in German.
dc.description.abstractOught one to feed people rather than save nature? People value many worthwhile things over feeding the hungry; they post national boundaries against the poor; there is unjust distribution of wealth; escalating birthrates offset gains in alleviating poverty; there is low productivity on domesticated lands; sacrificed wildlands are often low in productivity; and significant natural values may be at stake. Sometimes, one ought to save nature.
dc.format.mediumborn digital
dc.format.mediumarticles
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationRolston, Holmes, III, Menschen Ernähren Oder Natur Erhalten?, Conceptus: Zeitschrift für Philosphie 29, nr. 74 (1996): 1-25.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10217/37605
dc.languageGerman
dc.publisherColorado State University. Libraries
dc.publisher.originalUniversity of Salzburg, Germany
dc.relation.ispartofEnvironmental Ethics: Anthologies and Journal Articles - Rolston (Holmes) Collection
dc.rights©1996 University of Salzburg
dc.subjectenvironmental ethics
dc.subjectsustainable development
dc.subjecthumans
dc.subjectnature
dc.subjectenvironmental protection
dc.subjectpoverty
dc.subjectRio Declaration
dc.subjectsocial justice
dc.subjecthunger
dc.subjectpopulation
dc.titleMenschen ernähren oder natur erhalten?
dc.title.alternativeFeeding people versus saving nature?
dc.typeText


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record