Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorAngeloni, Lisa
dc.contributor.advisorFunk, Chris
dc.contributor.authorKronenberger, John Andrew
dc.contributor.committeememberGhalambor, Cameron
dc.contributor.committeememberHufbauer, Ruth
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-09T15:42:52Z
dc.date.available2017-06-09T15:42:52Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description2017 Spring.
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references.
dc.description.abstractIncreased isolation of populations, and the subsequent reduction in genetic diversity, can exacerbate global biodiversity loss by contributing to inbreeding depression and reducing the ability of organisms to adapt to rapid environmental change. This has prompted some conservation biologists to consider augmenting isolated populations with immigrants as a means of demographic and genetic rescue. Augmentations are typically highly successful, but they are also controversial due to the risk of outbreeding depression or the introduction of maladapted alleles when immigrants are genetically or adaptively divergent. For my Master's thesis, I tested risky augmentation scenarios using mesocosm populations of Trinidadian guppies (Poecilia reticulata) in two separate controlled experiments. In my first experiment (Chapter 1), I augmented mesocosm populations derived from a single recipient source with genetically or adaptively divergent immigrants to assess their short-term demographic effects. Mesocosms that were augmented maintained greater abundance and recruitment than controls that were not. There was also a trend for populations to receive a greater benefit from immigrants that were genetically divergent than those that were adaptively divergent. I expanded upon these results in my second experiment (Chapter 2), in which I augmented mesocosm populations from two different recipient sources with immigrants spanning a greater range of divergence and monitored them over a longer time frame, including an additional control and genetic monitoring to determine the relative impact of demography and genetics. Despite no evidence for demographic rescue, I found genetic rescue in one recipient population. Divergent immigrants did not have a negative effect in almost all cases, and any positive effect they had depended on the genetic diversity, immigrant fitness, and recipient life-history traits. Together, these experiments provide strong evidence that immigrants can bolster population fitness despite being divergent, thereby supporting the use of augmentation as a management technique in dire situations when no safe immigrant sources are available.
dc.format.mediumborn digital
dc.format.mediummasters theses
dc.identifierKronenberger_colostate_0053N_14152.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10217/181422
dc.languageEnglish
dc.publisherColorado State University. Libraries
dc.relation.ispartof2000-2019 - CSU Theses and Dissertations
dc.rightsCopyright of the original work is retained by the author.
dc.subjectdemographic rescue
dc.subjectinbreeding depression
dc.subjectgenetic rescue
dc.subjectaugmentation
dc.subjectoutbreeding depression
dc.subject.lcshPoecilia reticulata
dc.titleExperimental tests of risky augmentation scenarios using Trinidadian guppies
dc.typeText
dcterms.rights.dplaThe copyright and related rights status of this item has not been evaluated (https://rightsstatements.org/vocab/CNE/1.0/). Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.
thesis.degree.disciplineEcology
thesis.degree.grantorColorado State University
thesis.degree.levelMasters
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Science (M.S.)


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record