Browsing by Author "Brummer, Joe, advisor"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Open Access Agronomic responses of grass and alfalfa hayfields to no and partial season irrigation as part of a Western Slope water bank(Colorado State University. Libraries, 2015) Jones, Lyndsay P., author; Brummer, Joe, advisor; Cabot, Perry, committee member; Davis, Jessica, committee memberProlonged drought and increasing demand for water resources has caused growing concern over Colorado's ability to fulfill legal water obligations as identified in the Colorado River Compact. A Western Slope Water Bank, which would entail agricultural water users entering into short-term leases and temporarily withholding or reducing irrigation, could be a partial solution to free up water to fulfill these obligations. Grass and alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) hayfields may be ideal for inclusion in a water bank as they are the primary users of agricultural water in this region and may have a greater ability to withstand water stress in comparison to other crops. This study was conducted to determine effects of withholding irrigation for a full season from high elevation grass hayfields and implementing partial season irrigation on lower elevation alfalfa hayfields on forage yield, nutritional quality, and associated recovery period to confirm if this approach is worth pursuing. In Year 1, five established grass hayfields on the Colorado Western Slope were split into side-by-side plots, one of which was irrigated according to the manager’s normal practices as the control while the other was subjected to total cessation of irrigation. Both plots were irrigated in Year 2. In Year 1, average dry matter yields in non-irrigated plots were reduced to 39% (2497 kg ha-1) of the control (6377 kg ha-1). Neutral detergent fiber (aNDF) concentration in non-irrigated plots was 5% lower while crude protein (CP) content was 30% greater than the control. In-vitro true digestibility (IVTD) was unaffected by irrigation treatment. Yields of non-irrigated plots did not fully recover when returned to irrigation in Year 2 producing 49% (3623 kg ha-1) of the control (7442 kg ha-1). When returned to irrigation, aNDF concentrations were still reduced by 8% and CP contents were similar to that of the control. In the single site sampled after returning to full irrigation for 2 years, yields had fully recovered. It is probable that participation by producers in a water bank would be largely influenced by compensation for reduced yields the season of withholding irrigation as well as the following year when irrigation is returned to grass hayfields. Three established alfalfa fields were subjected to irrigation treatments including irrigation according to the manager’s normal practices (control), irrigation stopped after the 1st cutting (SA1), and irrigation stopped after the 2nd cutting (SA2) for 2 consecutive years. Averaged over both years, SA2 plots maintained production similar to the control in the 1st and 2nd cutting while SA1 plots were reduced to 61% (2089 kg ha-1) of the control (3430 kg ha-1) by the 2nd cutting. By the 3rd cutting, SA2 and SA1 yields decreased to 53% (1804 kg ha-1) and 30% (1013 kg ha-1) of the control, respectively. On a total season basis, both plots receiving partial season irrigation were reduced with SA2 plots producing 72% (7880 kg ha-1) and SA1 plots producing 33% (3650 kg ha-1) of the control (11040 kg ha-1). aNDF concentrations were greatest in the control at 34.6% and lowest in SA1 plots at 28.2%. By the 2nd cutting, SA1 plots had the highest IVTD (80%), and by the 3rd cutting, SA2 and SA1 plots were equally greater (80%) than the control (75%). Effects on CP content were inconsistent. These results suggest that reduced irrigation may improve forage quality slightly, but will significantly reduce yields. When irrigation is returned the following year, forages may have increased quality due to reduced fiber content, but grass yields will likely not fully recover while alfalfa yields may recover depending on length and severity of reduced irrigation. Due to its ability to recover, using partial season irrigation similar to that of the SA2 treatment on alfalfa hayfields may be the most practical approach to make water available to a Western Slope water bank.Item Open Access Effects of Management-intensive Grazing in relation to soil health and forage production in an irrigated perennial pasture system(Colorado State University. Libraries, 2019) Shawver, Casey, author; Brummer, Joe, advisor; Ippolito, James, committee member; Ahola, Jason, committee member; Rhoades, Ryan, committee memberInterest in Management-intensive Grazing (MiG) on irrigated, perennial, cool-season pasture has increased steadily in Colorado due to pressure to reduce public lands grazing, overall declining space available for pasture, and declining commodity prices. However, there are still many unknowns about how forage production, forage quality, plant diversity, and soil quality are affected by this management over the long-term. To investigate potential effects on these variables, a study was undertaken on a full-scale, 82 ha, center pivot-irrigated, perennial pasture that had recently been planted with four different species mixtures at the Colorado State University Agriculture, Research, Development and Education Center located 13 km northeast of Fort Collins, CO. During the first one and a half years of production, approximately 230 animal units (AUs) consisting of cow-calf pairs, yearling heifers, and yearling steers were grazed using management-intensive practices. Paddock size was dynamic and determined based on number of animals and forage availability with animals generally moved daily. Forage yield and quality, botanical composition and cover, animal unit days (AUDs), and soil quality parameters were measured. In both 2017 and 2018, species mixtures that were either hayed or grazed first in the rotation induced vegetative regrowth resulting in the greatest quality. Quality remained high enough through the grazing season to meet cattle nutrient requirements regardless of the species mixture. There was no significant difference between seasonal mean yields in 2017. The simple grass-legume mixture resulted in the greatest seasonal mean yield in 2018 with 3916 kg/ha-1 but the complex grass mixture resulted in greatest AUDs (7493.93 AUDs). Bare patches developed around patches of non-soft leaf tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Shreb.) in this mix, which made it evident that cattle were selecting against this type of tall fescue. Botanical composition assessments did not align with the initial seeding rates in some cases, which suggests soil conditions, plant phenology, and competitive advantages contributed to differences between seeded and established composition of the mixtures. Ground cover showed that litter was similar among species mixtures that were planted and grazed earlier compared to the species mixture that was not. Mean plant cover (23.75%) was similar among all mixtures. Soil analysis included 11 biological, chemical, nutrient, and physical parameters that were aggregated into the Soil Management Assessment Framework (SMAF) program resulting in soil quality index (SQI) values. Positive soil quality effects were observed in the biological SQI with increases in microbial and enzymatic activities. Soil organic carbon remained relatively unchanged. Negative impacts occurred to the soil physical SQI, driven primarily by increasing bulk density. The nutrient SQI value declined due to the observed reduction in extractable soil P due to low concentrations occurring in multiple soil samples; similar observations occurred in all three extractions. In a separate soil physical property study, penetrometer resistance was measured due to grazing that occurred during wet conditions. Soil resistance was greater for paddocks grazed under wet conditions but was not yet at levels that would affect root growth and plant productivity. The overall results of this study suggest that this irrigated, MiG system has the potential for success in regard to forage production and quality and its ability to support grazing, but will need further research to determine the long-term impacts of grazing on soil quality and species composition shifts.Item Open Access Intercropping alfalfa with select grass species for increased yield and quality under deficit irrigation(Colorado State University. Libraries, 2023) Doyle, Hunter, author; Brummer, Joe, advisor; Cabot, Perry, committee member; Ippolito, Jim, committee memberDrought and water scarcity have plagued the Western US for decades. As these issues become more prevalent, we must explore possibilities to utilize available water more efficiently. The objective of this study was to: Evaluate the ability of mixed and stripped intercropping alfalfa with grasses to increase yield and quality of the forage produced under deficit irrigation. Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) is the most common forage grown in the West and is known for its high-water use. Intercropping alfalfa with perennial grasses can potentially improve water use efficiency. Orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata), meadow brome (Bromus biebersteinii), and tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) were mixed on the same bed or strip intercropped on alternating beds with alfalfa under 100% and 60% ET irrigation regimes using subsurface drip irrigation. Three cuts occurred in 2021 and 2022, with deficit irrigation starting after cut one. Yield, crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), neutral detergent fiber digestibility (NDFD), and relative feed value (RFV) were analyzed in this study. During year one, irrigation did not have a significant impact on yield due to high precipitation and the fact that alfalfa performs well under deficit irrigation. Quality was not affected by irrigation treatments throughout both years of this study. Planting treatments significantly impacted yield and all quality parameters throughout this study. In 2021, mixed intercropping treatments averaged 14,210 kg ha-1, stripped treatments averaged 12,285 kg ha-1, and alfalfa averaged 13,406 kg ha-1; significant differences were not present. All mixed treatments, tall fescue stripped, and meadow brome stripped yields were similar to alfalfa in 2021. In 2021, quality was generally only reduced in mixed intercropping treatments compared to alfalfa in the first cutting. The inclusion of grasses with alfalfa reduced crude protein content and increased neutral detergent fiber content during cutting one, overall reducing quality. In cuttings two and three, mixed intercropping did not generally reduce quality. Stripped treatments also reduced quality in cutting one but did not have a large effect on quality in subsequent cuttings. Relative feed value, a common parameter used among producers, was similar among all treatments for all cuttings in 2021. In 2022, deficit irrigation had a significant impact on yield in cuttings two and three. Yields due to deficit irrigation were reduced by 22% and 35% in cuttings two and three, respectively. Total yearly yields were reduced by 12.5% between irrigation treatments. Total yields in mixed intercropping treatments were significantly higher than the alfalfa monoculture, especially the tall fescue and orchardgrass. Meadow brome generally had a higher yield than alfalfa, though not always significant. Mixed treatments averaged 13,308 kg ha-1 and stripped treatments averaged 9,488 kg ha-1 compared to alfalfa at 10,758 kg ha-1. Similar to 2021, quality was only reduced in intercropping treatments during the first cutting. Crude protein and RFV decreased while NDF and ADF increased in intercropping treatments compared to alfalfa alone, resulting in reduced quality. In subsequent cuttings, quality was generally similar among intercropping treatments and alfalfa alone. Mixed intercropping demonstrated to be more productive throughout both years of this study compared to stripped intercropping. Advantages from intercropping were reduced in stripped treatments due to independent cultivation and limited species interactions. Grass species did not have as large of an effect on yield and quality compared to intercropping method. Tall fescue typically performed the best of the grasses, yet all grasses in mixed intercropping performed well compared to alfalfa. Mixed intercropping grass with alfalfa can lead to increased yields with minimal effects on forage quality compared to alfalfa alone. As severe drought continues in areas across the Western US, mixed intercropping could be an option for maintaining or improving yields while producing similar forage quality compared to alfalfa alone under deficit irrigation.