Green, Christopher, authorPickering, Kathleen, advisorVan Buren, Mary, committee memberRollin, Bernard, committee member2007-01-032007-01-032014http://hdl.handle.net/10217/82599The Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act of 1990 sought to empower Native communities to reattain their ancestral human remains, funerary objects, sacred objects, and objects of cultural patrimony. Issues both in theory and in practice have arisen in regard to the law and have made implementation difficult and controversial. This paper seeks to analyze the power provided by the legislation and how it applied in the practice of compliance. This power dynamic is then reconciled within the repatriation ethic of the United States as well as internationally. As the scope broadens, an international repatriation ethic emerges that establishes repatriation of culturally affiliatable human remains and sacred objects as a basic human right for indigenous peoples.born digitalmasters thesesengCopyright and other restrictions may apply. User is responsible for compliance with all applicable laws. For information about copyright law, please see https://libguides.colostate.edu/copyright.cultural resourceshuman remainshuman rightsNAGPRArepatriationsacred objectsPower inequity and the repatriation right in the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation ActText