Jones, Benjamin J., authorHoffer, Katherine A. Heriot, authorCenter for the New Energy Economy, publisher2025-02-202025-02-202024-10https://hdl.handle.net/10217/240102This report examines strategies to promote siting renewable energy projects on degraded lands. As states seek to deploy renewable energy, the issue of siting has become increasingly contentious. Clean power projects located on undeveloped "greenfields" can encounter opposition. Steering these projects towards contaminated, underutilized, and degraded lands provides an alternative with many advantages. Converting degraded "brownfield" properties into clean energy installations is commonly known as "brightfield" development. Unfortunately, several obstacles hinder such development. Although brightfields have been successfully developed in 46 states, states with multiple policies to encourage this approach have the most projects by a serious margin. This report first discusses the advantages and obstacles to siting renewable energy on degraded lands. We then provide a toolkit of programs, with existing state policy examples, that states can employ to facilitate brightfield development.born digitalreportsengCopyright and other restrictions may apply. User is responsible for compliance with all applicable laws. For information about copyright law, please see https://libguides.colostate.edu/copyright.This information is free and open; however CNEE asks that if you use its information in any way that you cite the following: "Information obtained from the Advanced Energy Legislation Tracker, Colorado State University's Center for the New Energy Economy and Advanced Energy Economy."Energy policyRenewable energy sources -- Law and legislationdegraded landsBrownfields to brightfields: state policy models to facilitate the reuse of degraded lands for renewable energyText