Carillo, Ellen C., authorUtah State University Press, publisher2021-12-022021-12-022021https://hdl.handle.net/10217/234047Intervenes in labor-based grading practice by expanding the scope of this assessment practice to include disabled and multiply marginalized students. Critiques the assumption that labor is a neutral measure to assess students and how labor-based grading put certain students at a disadvantage. Offering engagement-based grading as a more equitable assessment model.--Provided by publisher.Assumptions in labor-based contract grading -- Substituting one standard for another: the normative, laboring body at the Center of Labor-Based Grading Contracts -- Labor-based contract grading and students' mental health -- Labor-based grading contracts and students' intersectional identities -- The effectiveness of labor-based grading contracts -- Forging ahead.born digitalbooksengCopyright and other restrictions may apply. User is responsible for compliance with all applicable laws. For information about copyright law, please see https://libguides.colostate.edu/copyright.All rights reserved. User is responsible for compliance. Please contact University Press of Colorado at https://upcolorado.com/our-books/rights-and-permissions for use information.English language -- Rhetoric -- Ability testing -- United StatesCollege students -- Rating ofLearning -- EvaluationAcademic writing -- EvaluationGrading and marking (Students) -- United StatesTextAccess is limited to the Adams State University, Colorado School of Mines, Colorado State University, Colorado State University Pueblo, Fort Lewis College, Metropolitan State University of Denver, University of Alaska Fairbanks, University of Colorado Boulder, University of Colorado Colorado Springs, University of Colorado Denver, University of Denver, University of Northern Colorado, University of Wyoming, Utah State University, and Western Colorado University members only.