Mattingly, Victoria Prescott, authorKraiger, Kurt, advisorRhodes, Matthew, committee memberBeier, Margaret, committee memberChermack, Thomas, committee member2016-01-112016-01-112015http://hdl.handle.net/10217/170337Despite the proven benefits of spaced learning, students are reluctant to use this study technique. I proposed that students do not space their studying because they lack basic competencies needed to successfully engage in this behavior. According to the Theory of Planned Behavior, behaviors are the product of one’s intentions, which are derived from attitudes and beliefs. Using this theoretical framework, I designed and evaluated a classroom intervention with the goal of changing debilitating attitudes towards spaced learning. I hypothesized that students exposed to this spaced learning classroom intervention would have stronger intentions to space, higher rates of spaced learning behaviors, and consequently higher exam scores compared to the control group. Intentions to space and the beliefs and attitudes contributing to those intentions were improved by the classroom intervention. Students who spaced their studying also performed better on the exam compared to students who did not space. However, the classroom intervention did not significantly predict whether or not students would space their studying. Implications and future research directions based on the study's findings are also discussed.born digitalmasters thesesengCopyright and other restrictions may apply. User is responsible for compliance with all applicable laws. For information about copyright law, please see https://libguides.colostate.edu/copyright.distributed practicespaced learningspacing effecttheory of planned behaviorCounteracting student resistance to spaced learning using the Theory Of Planned BehaviorText