Rolston, Holmes, 1932-, authorPrentice-Hall, publisher2007-01-032007-01-031996Rolston, Holmes, III, Feeding People versus Saving Nature?, Aiken, William and Hugh LaFollette, eds., World Hunger and Morality, 2nd ed., 248-267. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1996.http://hdl.handle.net/10217/37604Includes bibliographical references (pages 266-267).Ought one to feed people rather than save nature? People value many worthwhile things over feeding the hungry; they post national boundaries against the poor; there is unjust distribution of wealth; escalating birthrates offset gains in alleviating poverty; there is low productivity on domesticated lands; sacrificed wildlands are often low in productivity; and significant natural values may be at stake. Sometimes, one ought to save nature.born digitalchapters (layout features)eng©1996 Prentice Hall. Reproduced by permission, Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ.Copyright and other restrictions may apply. User is responsible for compliance with all applicable laws. For information about copyright law, please see https://libguides.colostate.edu/copyright.Rio Declarationsocial justicesustainable developmentenvironmental ethicshumansnatureenvironmental protectionpovertyhungerpopulationFeeding people versus saving nature?Feeding people vs. saving nature?Text