Repository logo
 

A multiple case study of instructors utilizing classroom response systems (CRS) to achieve pedagogical goals

Date

2015

Authors

Milholland, Eric Stanley, author
Kaminski, Karen, advisor
Timpson, William, committee member
Most, David, committee member
Miller, Jeffrey, committee member

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Abstract

This study examined five instructors who have employed Classroom Response Systems (CRS) for a minimum of five years. Instructors were asked their initial pedagogical goals when adopting CRS, and also to describe any changes in those goals or use of the technology since that time. Emerging themes were identified using a multiple case study methodology. All instructors said their use of CRS evolved and changed from initial adoption to their current use of the technology today. Student engagement was the single ubiquitous reason provided for choosing to employ CRS. Other potential reason for using CRS include: peer instruction via group and cooperative learning, increasing student responsibility, reducing lecture while increasing interaction, employing deep learning pedagogy, redistributing classroom power back to students, increasing student achievement, and making classroom learning more enjoyable. No single technique appeared to be required to benefit from the use of CRS. Instructors described an assortment of practices they found personally successful in a variety of classroom sizes. Some even chose to utilize the same pedagogical techniques as if they were using CRS, but purposefully eschewed the devices because they found them too constraining for the desired learning outcome. This indicates that the teaching methodology was more important that the technology. CRS seems to be suitable for performing a variety of pedagogical tasks, even if it is not the ideal way to achieve any single one. Based on this research, it appears the greatest strength of CRS is that it can proficiently accomplish a multitude of learning goals in a relatively easy manner.

Description

Rights Access

Subject

classroom discussion
contingent teaching
student engagement
classroom response systems (CRS)
active learning
peer instruction

Citation

Associated Publications